The measurement of time is taken for granted in this atomic clock age,
In fact an accurate and robust method of time measurement was vital to enable shipping to navigate at sea with confidence.
Whilst Latitude is simple to measure Longitude is less so and this problem resulted in substantial loss of life and assets through shipwreck.
Even experienced Ships Masters could find themselves hundreds of miles off course.
In 1714, the British Government offered, by Act of Parliament,….
” £20,000 for a solution which could….
provide longitude to within half-a-degree (2 minutes of time). The methods would be tested…..
on a ship, sailing
…over the ocean, from Great Britain to any such Port in the West Indies as those Commissioners Choose… without losing their Longitude beyond the limits before mentioned
and should prove to be
…tried and found Practicable and Useful at Sea.”
This was the mandate laid down by the British Admiralties board of longitude to try and solve the problem of sailors and ships being lost at sea.
Incidentally £20,000 in today’s money is around 4.5 million ……that’s how serious the problem was.
There were two main contestants and schools of thought as to how to solve it.
The Lunar method championed by ……( I am not going to mention his name because he does not deserve it)
And the chronological method…. ultimately solved by John Harrison.
The fact that the Luna proponent also happened to chair the Admiralties board of commissioners added an interesting twist to the story and may in this case show that it is…
What you know and not who you know that counts.
Although it took a lifetime, and the intervention of King George 111 to prove it…. so I suppose….
What you know AND who you know is is the rub.
The Luna method by definition involved finding longitude by using the moons cycles ….and was impracticable …unreliable …and too complex to mention.
The only realistic answer was to build a clock that was (in those days)
fantasticlly accurate,
and able to funtion without fail during the rigours of a sea voyage.
No mean feat with the tools, materials and expertise of the age.
John Harrison started making clocks from wood and although brilliant in conception and construction the material was totally unsuitable for the purpose.
His first serious attempts to make a ships clock were made in metal and are in…
the British Maritime museum ….
known as H1, H2 , and H3, they are works of art as well as mechanical wonders, and still work to this day
These three clocks were developed over a lifetime …
All were rejected by the Admiralty.…
who’s chairman was still advocating his own Luna method (surprise, surprise!)
Finally Harrison submitted his masterpiece… H4 …. in 1759
Although this timepiece fulfilled the original Admiralty mandate it was still rejected…
and through subterfuge and downright deceit the commissioners connived to withhold Harrison’s prize money.
Only in 1773 when The king himself ordered the money to be paid did Harrison receive his just reward, he was 80 years old and only lived another 3 years to enjoy it. in fact he was never paid in full…. ( no one ever was) …..
There is no doubt that John Harrison was a genius, who had some of the characteristics of a great man
Tenacity
Perseverance
Self Belief
Intelligence
Vision
But he also had flaws that made his journey harder
Stubbornness
An inability to work with others
Poor social skills
Single Mindedness
Some of these traits are two sides of the same coin.
In fact several members of the Admiralty were pro Harrison’s H4 timepiece, they knew the Luna method could not work and recognised the answer lay with Harrison.
Harrison’s faults however, ostracised him, and left him with few allies.
Had Harrison understood the power of partnerships he may have enjoyed his prize money for longer and benefited from a less stressful life. His stubbornness was a two edged sword.
I sometimes think of John Harrison and the lessons that can be learned from his life…
And don’t get me wrong here…. he did collaborate … it is a question of with whom….
Having an idea and belief is all important but it is not always enough….
the right mentors and partnerships…. should not be overlooked lightly.
Recently I received an e-mail from Andy Brown a highly experienced and successful marketer who works with Neil Stafford…. and Neil Travers… (known as the two Neils … you may have received an e-mail from Daniel Wagner regarding them. During a later skype conversation Andy gave me some valuable insights into IM (they will be the subject of a later post).
He also suggested I look at
https://stafford.infusionsoft.com/go/nplb/vincea
It’s Free…..
It’s up to you if you want to make more of it….
All mechanical clocks are governed by friction…. Consider the dates quoted above… 1759….1773 for example 14 years by any reckoning and just a small part of this story…. but a significant part of a lifetime by any timepiece.

I was watching a show on one of the cable channels and it was a pretty in-depth study of time. That attacked it from 2 angles:
a) Does time actually exist (i.e. is it a human creation or is it a true dimension)
b) The more mundane (but immensely practical) topic of measurement.
Bottom line… I like clocks, particularly old clocks. And I loved the book “Longitude”. As a sailor who regularly navigates the “old fashioned” way of sextant and Naval Observatory tables, I rely on a $25 Timex Ironman when I shoot the sun (or moon). Hey, what’s 20 miles of so when you’re travelling 2,000 over open ocean alone. And yes. I have 2 backup Ironman’s.
Thanks for expanding on the longitude aspect of time.
Tricia´s last blog ..Welcome to Cosmetic Surgery Connecticut
Verrrryy interesting, Vincemeister.
I have studied a fair bit about time but did not know this aspect of Harrison’s invention. The lessons you garnered from JH are timely indeed
and you are absolutely right about crusty being a one way street to No Help.
Our attitudes can overwhelm our aptitudes and so few folks know about this that it is both alarming and the main reason why I try to be as rude as possible.
Thanks for this fantabulous take on history, mister. Good one.
Barry
Barry the Boring Blogger´s last blog ..Want A Clean Mind Change It More Often Than Your Underware
Hey Barry
I have been called a lot of things but not Vincemeister Ha Ha
Great comment and thanks for visiting, I really like your take on things, your blog is definatly not boring, in the words of Arnie I’ll be back
Vince,
It was just tonight I was talking to someone about nepotism and related subjects and how promotions or, in this case, rewards, go to those who do not really get the job done but who have the “right connections”, and I was asking if it used to be as big a problem as it is today.
Apparently so.
Cheryl Jones
Cheryl Jones´s last blog ..Pages
Hi Cheryl
Yes I don’t think much changes.
Thank you for visiting
Vince
Hi Vince
Very interesting but what I always say time is not a renewable resource. Once it is gone it is gone forever.
A little about me – My name is Sue McDonald and I am a student of Mark Terrell and I am actually going through the course a second time – by invitation. I love it and know if I do all he says, I will be successful. I am Australian but the US is my second home as I have family there and visit quite often. This is why I started Internet Marketing so I can travel whenever I want and have the money to do what I want.
Well I hope you are doing well and you become very successful. I would love you to come visit my blog and leave a comment.
Kind regards
Sue
Sue McDonald´s last blog ..Week 3 of the Newbies Course
Hi Sue
I wish you all the best with your endeavour
Hey Vince,
Very interesting bit of history! Interesting tie into internet marketing too.
Anyone is IM certainly need all of these attributes: tenacity, perseverance, self belief, intelligence, and vision
Best Regards,
Alice
Hi Alice
You are right but I think it is something we need in all aspects of life. IM is just a small part, I suppose John Harrison focused ( and I have massive respect for that ) I